mm: remove zone_lru_lock() function, access ->lru_lock directly

We have common pattern to access lru_lock from a page pointer:
	zone_lru_lock(page_zone(page))

Which is silly, because it unfolds to this:
	&NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_zones[page_zonenum(page)]->zone_pgdat->lru_lock
while we can simply do
	&NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->lru_lock

Remove zone_lru_lock() function, since it's only complicate things.  Use
'page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock' pattern instead.

[aryabinin@virtuozzo.com: a slightly better version of __split_huge_page()]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301121651.7741-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190228083329.31892-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt

@@ -267,11 +267,11 @@ When oom event notifier is registered, event will be delivered.
    Other lock order is following:
    PG_locked.
    mm->page_table_lock
-       zone_lru_lock
+       pgdat->lru_lock
 	  lock_page_cgroup.
   In many cases, just lock_page_cgroup() is called.
   per-zone-per-cgroup LRU (cgroup's private LRU) is just guarded by
-  zone_lru_lock, it has no lock of its own.
+  pgdat->lru_lock, it has no lock of its own.
 
 2.7 Kernel Memory Extension (CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM)