xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'xfs-4.8-misc-fixes-4' into for-next

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Dave Chinner
2016-07-22 14:10:56 +10:00
parent dc4113d243 72ccbbe154
commit f2bdfda9a1
11 changed files with 260 additions and 104 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

59
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
View File

@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ xfs_da3_split(
struct xfs_da_state_blk *newblk;
struct xfs_da_state_blk *addblk;
struct xfs_da_intnode *node;
struct xfs_buf *bp;
int max;
int action = 0;
int error;
@@ -397,7 +396,9 @@ xfs_da3_split(
break;
}
/*
* Entry wouldn't fit, split the leaf again.
* Entry wouldn't fit, split the leaf again. The new
* extrablk will be consumed by xfs_da3_node_split if
* the node is split.
*/
state->extravalid = 1;
if (state->inleaf) {
@@ -445,6 +446,14 @@ xfs_da3_split(
if (!addblk)
return 0;
/*
* xfs_da3_node_split() should have consumed any extra blocks we added
* during a double leaf split in the attr fork. This is guaranteed as
* we can't be here if the attr fork only has a single leaf block.
*/
ASSERT(state->extravalid == 0 ||
state->path.blk[max].magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
/*
* Split the root node.
*/
@@ -457,43 +466,33 @@ xfs_da3_split(
}
/*
* Update pointers to the node which used to be block 0 and
* just got bumped because of the addition of a new root node.
* There might be three blocks involved if a double split occurred,
* and the original block 0 could be at any position in the list.
* Update pointers to the node which used to be block 0 and just got
* bumped because of the addition of a new root node. Note that the
* original block 0 could be at any position in the list of blocks in
* the tree.
*
* Note: the magic numbers and sibling pointers are in the same
* physical place for both v2 and v3 headers (by design). Hence it
* doesn't matter which version of the xfs_da_intnode structure we use
* here as the result will be the same using either structure.
* Note: the magic numbers and sibling pointers are in the same physical
* place for both v2 and v3 headers (by design). Hence it doesn't matter
* which version of the xfs_da_intnode structure we use here as the
* result will be the same using either structure.
*/
node = oldblk->bp->b_addr;
if (node->hdr.info.forw) {
if (be32_to_cpu(node->hdr.info.forw) == addblk->blkno) {
bp = addblk->bp;
} else {
ASSERT(state->extravalid);
bp = state->extrablk.bp;
}
node = bp->b_addr;
ASSERT(be32_to_cpu(node->hdr.info.forw) == addblk->blkno);
node = addblk->bp->b_addr;
node->hdr.info.back = cpu_to_be32(oldblk->blkno);
xfs_trans_log_buf(state->args->trans, bp,
XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(node, &node->hdr.info,
sizeof(node->hdr.info)));
xfs_trans_log_buf(state->args->trans, addblk->bp,
XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(node, &node->hdr.info,
sizeof(node->hdr.info)));
}
node = oldblk->bp->b_addr;
if (node->hdr.info.back) {
if (be32_to_cpu(node->hdr.info.back) == addblk->blkno) {
bp = addblk->bp;
} else {
ASSERT(state->extravalid);
bp = state->extrablk.bp;
}
node = bp->b_addr;
ASSERT(be32_to_cpu(node->hdr.info.back) == addblk->blkno);
node = addblk->bp->b_addr;
node->hdr.info.forw = cpu_to_be32(oldblk->blkno);
xfs_trans_log_buf(state->args->trans, bp,
XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(node, &node->hdr.info,
sizeof(node->hdr.info)));
xfs_trans_log_buf(state->args->trans, addblk->bp,
XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(node, &node->hdr.info,
sizeof(node->hdr.info)));
}
addblk->bp = NULL;
return 0;