drm/core: Use recommened kerneldoc for struct member refs

I just learned that &struct_name.member_name works and looks pretty
even. It doesn't (yet) link to the member directly though, which would
be really good for big structures or vfunc tables (where the
per-member kerneldoc tends to be long).

Also some minor drive-by polish where it makes sense, I read a lot
of docs ...

v2: Review from Gustavo.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170125062657.19270-6-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Vetter
2017-01-25 07:26:47 +01:00
parent 940eba2d58
commit ef40cbf999
10 changed files with 33 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void store_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
*
* Only to be called from drm_crtc_vblank_on().
*
* Note: caller must hold dev->vbl_lock since this reads & writes
* Note: caller must hold &drm_device.vbl_lock since this reads & writes
* device vblank fields.
*/
static void drm_reset_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static void drm_reset_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe
* Only necessary when going from off->on, to account for frames we
* didn't get an interrupt for.
*
* Note: caller must hold dev->vbl_lock since this reads & writes
* Note: caller must hold &drm_device.vbl_lock since this reads & writes
* device vblank fields.
*/
static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void drm_irq_vgaarb_nokms(void *cookie, bool state)
*
* This is the simplified helper interface provided for drivers with no special
* needs. Drivers which need to install interrupt handlers for multiple
* interrupts must instead set drm_device->irq_enabled to signal the DRM core
* interrupts must instead set &drm_device.irq_enabled to signal the DRM core
* that vblank interrupts are available.
*
* Returns:
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_irq_install);
* Calls the driver's irq_uninstall() function and unregisters the IRQ handler.
* This should only be called by drivers which used drm_irq_install() to set up
* their interrupt handler. Other drivers must only reset
* drm_device->irq_enabled to false.
* &drm_device.irq_enabled to false.
*
* Note that for kernel modesetting drivers it is a bug if this function fails.
* The sanity checks are only to catch buggy user modesetting drivers which call
@@ -982,12 +982,11 @@ static void send_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev,
* period. This helper function implements exactly the required vblank arming
* behaviour.
*
* NOTE: Drivers using this to send out the event in &struct drm_crtc_state
* as part of an atomic commit must ensure that the next vblank happens at
* exactly the same time as the atomic commit is committed to the hardware. This
* function itself does **not** protect again the next vblank interrupt racing
* with either this function call or the atomic commit operation. A possible
* sequence could be:
* NOTE: Drivers using this to send out the &drm_crtc_state.event as part of an
* atomic commit must ensure that the next vblank happens at exactly the same
* time as the atomic commit is committed to the hardware. This function itself
* does **not** protect again the next vblank interrupt racing with either this
* function call or the atomic commit operation. A possible sequence could be:
*
* 1. Driver commits new hardware state into vblank-synchronized registers.
* 2. A vblank happens, committing the hardware state. Also the corresponding