perf: Fix sibling iteration

Mark noticed that the change to sibling_list changed some iteration
semantics; because previously we used group_list as list entry,
sibling events would always have an empty sibling_list.

But because we now use sibling_list for both list head and list entry,
siblings will report as having siblings.

Fix this with a custom for_each_sibling_event() iterator.

Fixes: 8343aae661 ("perf/core: Remove perf_event::group_entry")
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com
Cc: valery.cherepennikov@intel.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: acme@redhat.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davidcc@google.com
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315170129.GX4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
此提交包含在:
Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-15 17:36:56 +01:00
提交者 Thomas Gleixner
父節點 32ff77e8cc
當前提交 edb39592a5
共有 19 個檔案被更改,包括 41 行新增40 行删除

查看文件

@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static bool l2x0_pmu_group_is_valid(struct perf_event *event)
else if (!is_software_event(leader))
return false;
list_for_each_entry(sibling, &leader->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
if (sibling->pmu == pmu)
num_hw++;
else if (!is_software_event(sibling))