x86/mm: Stop pretending pgtable_l5_enabled is a variable
pgtable_l5_enabled is defined using cpu_feature_enabled() but we refer to it as a variable. This is misleading. Make pgtable_l5_enabled() a function. We cannot literally define it as a function due to circular dependencies between header files. Function-alike macros is close enough. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180518103528.59260-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
ad3fe525b9
commit
ed7588d5dc
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ again:
|
||||
* critical -- __PAGE_OFFSET would point us back into the dynamic
|
||||
* range and we might end up looping forever...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!pgtable_l5_enabled)
|
||||
if (!pgtable_l5_enabled())
|
||||
p4d_p = pgd_p;
|
||||
else if (pgd)
|
||||
p4d_p = (p4dval_t *)((pgd & PTE_PFN_MASK) + __START_KERNEL_map - phys_base);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user