jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig

Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label".

The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined
like this:

  #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
  # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
  #endif

We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then
make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO.

Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will
match to the real kernel capability.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Masahiro Yamada
2018-12-31 00:14:15 +09:00
父節點 72d3ebb929
當前提交 e9666d10a5
共有 42 個文件被更改,包括 65 次插入119 次删除

查看文件

@@ -2,19 +2,6 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_JUMP_LABEL_H
#define _ASM_X86_JUMP_LABEL_H
#ifndef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
/*
* For better or for worse, if jump labels (the gcc extension) are missing,
* then the entire static branch patching infrastructure is compiled out.
* If that happens, the code in here will malfunction. Raise a compiler
* error instead.
*
* In theory, jump labels and the static branch patching infrastructure
* could be decoupled to fix this.
*/
#error asm/jump_label.h included on a non-jump-label kernel
#endif
#define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE 5
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64