timekeeping: Split jiffies seqlock
seqlock consists of a sequence counter and a spinlock_t which is used to serialize the writers. spinlock_t is substituted by a "sleeping" spinlock on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels which breaks the usage in the timekeeping code as the writers are executed in hard interrupt and therefore non-preemptible context even on PREEMPT_RT. The spinlock in seqlock cannot be unconditionally replaced by a raw_spinlock_t as many seqlock users have nesting spinlock sections or other code which is not suitable to run in truly atomic context on RT. Instead of providing a raw_seqlock API for a single use case, open code the seqlock for the jiffies use case and implement it with a raw_spinlock_t and a sequence counter. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.120587764@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Peter Zijlstra

parent
919e9e6395
commit
e5d4d1756b
@@ -84,13 +84,15 @@ int tick_is_oneshot_available(void)
|
||||
static void tick_periodic(int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu) {
|
||||
write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Keep track of the next tick event */
|
||||
tick_next_period = ktime_add(tick_next_period, tick_period);
|
||||
|
||||
do_timer(1);
|
||||
write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
update_wall_time();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -162,9 +164,9 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast)
|
||||
ktime_t next;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
next = tick_next_period;
|
||||
} while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq));
|
||||
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq));
|
||||
|
||||
clockevents_switch_state(dev, CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user