perf tools: Use list_del_init() more thorougly

To allow for destructors to check if they're operating on a object still
in a list, and to avoid going from use after free list entries into
still valid, or even also other already removed from list entries.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-deh17ub44atyox3j90e6rksu@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-07-04 12:13:46 -03:00
parent d8f9da2404
commit e56fbc9dc7
22 changed files with 38 additions and 38 deletions

View File

@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ broken:
/* broken lock sequence, discard it */
ls->discard = 1;
bad_hist[BROKEN_ACQUIRE]++;
list_del(&seq->list);
list_del_init(&seq->list);
free(seq);
goto end;
default:
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int report_lock_acquired_event(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
/* broken lock sequence, discard it */
ls->discard = 1;
bad_hist[BROKEN_ACQUIRED]++;
list_del(&seq->list);
list_del_init(&seq->list);
free(seq);
goto end;
default:
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static int report_lock_contended_event(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
/* broken lock sequence, discard it */
ls->discard = 1;
bad_hist[BROKEN_CONTENDED]++;
list_del(&seq->list);
list_del_init(&seq->list);
free(seq);
goto end;
default:
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ static int report_lock_release_event(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
ls->nr_release++;
free_seq:
list_del(&seq->list);
list_del_init(&seq->list);
free(seq);
end:
return 0;