mfd: sec: Fix RTC alarm interrupt number on S2MPS11

The RTC on S2MPS11 is the same as S2MPS14. However interrupt numbers of
RTC alarms 0 and 1 were inversed between these two devices. So when
rtc-s5m driver requested S2MPS14_IRQ_RTCA0 interrupt, it matched to
S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1, not RTCA0.

Fix this by using consistent RTC alarm interrupt numbers and adding a
BUILD_BUG_ON for future generations.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c

@@ -61,14 +61,14 @@ static const struct regmap_irq s2mps11_irqs[] = {
 		.reg_offset = 1,
 		.mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC60S_MASK,
 	},
-	[S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0] = {
-		.reg_offset = 1,
-		.mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0_MASK,
-	},
 	[S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1] = {
 		.reg_offset = 1,
 		.mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1_MASK,
 	},
+	[S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0] = {
+		.reg_offset = 1,
+		.mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0_MASK,
+	},
 	[S2MPS11_IRQ_SMPL] = {
 		.reg_offset = 1,
 		.mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_SMPL_MASK,
@@ -484,6 +484,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * The rtc-s5m driver requests S2MPS14_IRQ_RTCA0 also for S2MPS11
+	 * so the interrupt number must be consistent.
+	 */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(((enum s2mps14_irq)S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0) != S2MPS14_IRQ_RTCA0);
+
 	return 0;
 }