Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking/atomics update from Thomas Gleixner:
 "The locking, atomics and memory model brains delivered:

   - A larger update to the atomics code which reworks the ordering
     barriers, consolidates the atomic primitives, provides the new
     atomic64_fetch_add_unless() primitive and cleans up the include
     hell.

   - Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation and add instrumentation for
     xchg() and cmpxchg_double().

   - Updates to the memory model and documentation"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (48 commits)
  locking/atomics: Rework ordering barriers
  locking/atomics: Instrument cmpxchg_double*()
  locking/atomics: Instrument xchg()
  locking/atomics: Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation
  locking/atomics/x86: Reduce arch_cmpxchg64*() instrumentation
  tools/memory-model: Rename litmus tests to comply to norm7
  tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix typo, smb->smp
  sched/Documentation: Update wake_up() & co. memory-barrier guarantees
  locking/spinlock, sched/core: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock()
  sched/core: Use smp_mb() in wake_woken_function()
  tools/memory-model: Add informal LKMM documentation to MAINTAINERS
  locking/atomics/Documentation: Describe atomic_set() as a write operation
  tools/memory-model: Make scripts executable
  tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from model
  tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from recipes
  locking/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Update Korean translation to fix broken DMA vs. MMIO ordering example
  MAINTAINERS: Add Daniel Lustig as an LKMM reviewer
  tools/memory-model: Fix ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce name
  tools/memory-model: Add litmus test for full multicopy atomicity
  locking/refcount: Always allow checked forms
  ...
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds
2018-08-13 12:23:39 -07:00
77 changed files with 991 additions and 1985 deletions

View File

@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map,
{
int refold;
refold = __atomic_add_unless(&map->refcnt, 1, 0);
refold = atomic_fetch_add_unless(&map->refcnt, 1, 0);
if (refold >= BPF_MAX_REFCNT) {
__bpf_map_put(map, false);
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
int refold;
refold = __atomic_add_unless(&prog->aux->refcnt, 1, 0);
refold = atomic_fetch_add_unless(&prog->aux->refcnt, 1, 0);
if (refold >= BPF_MAX_REFCNT) {
__bpf_prog_put(prog, false);

View File

@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
*
* See also complete_all(), wait_for_completion() and related routines.
*
* It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
* changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
* If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before
* accessing the task state.
*/
void complete(struct completion *x)
{
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete);
*
* This will wake up all threads waiting on this particular completion event.
*
* It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
* changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
* If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before
* accessing the task state.
*
* Since complete_all() sets the completion of @x permanently to done
* to allow multiple waiters to finish, a call to reinit_completion()

View File

@@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
* its already queued (either by us or someone else) and will get the
* wakeup due to that.
*
* This cmpxchg() implies a full barrier, which pairs with the write
* barrier implied by the wakeup in wake_up_q().
* This cmpxchg() executes a full barrier, which pairs with the full
* barrier executed by the wakeup in wake_up_q().
*/
if (cmpxchg(&node->next, NULL, WAKE_Q_TAIL))
return;
@@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
task->wake_q.next = NULL;
/*
* wake_up_process() implies a wmb() to pair with the queueing
* in wake_q_add() so as not to miss wakeups.
* wake_up_process() executes a full barrier, which pairs with
* the queueing in wake_q_add() so as not to miss wakeups.
*/
wake_up_process(task);
put_task_struct(task);
@@ -1859,8 +1859,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
* rq(c1)->lock (if not at the same time, then in that order).
* C) LOCK of the rq(c1)->lock scheduling in task
*
* Transitivity guarantees that B happens after A and C after B.
* Note: we only require RCpc transitivity.
* Release/acquire chaining guarantees that B happens after A and C after B.
* Note: the CPU doing B need not be c0 or c1
*
* Example:
@@ -1922,16 +1921,9 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
* UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
*
*
* However; for wakeups there is a second guarantee we must provide, namely we
* must observe the state that lead to our wakeup. That is, not only must our
* task observe its own prior state, it must also observe the stores prior to
* its wakeup.
*
* This means that any means of doing remote wakeups must order the CPU doing
* the wakeup against the CPU the task is going to end up running on. This,
* however, is already required for the regular Program-Order guarantee above,
* since the waking CPU is the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_load_acquire).
*
* However, for wakeups there is a second guarantee we must provide, namely we
* must ensure that CONDITION=1 done by the caller can not be reordered with
* accesses to the task state; see try_to_wake_up() and set_current_state().
*/
/**
@@ -1947,6 +1939,9 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
* Atomic against schedule() which would dequeue a task, also see
* set_current_state().
*
* This function executes a full memory barrier before accessing the task
* state; see set_current_state().
*
* Return: %true if @p->state changes (an actual wakeup was done),
* %false otherwise.
*/
@@ -1978,21 +1973,20 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
* be possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0 and get stuck
* in smp_cond_load_acquire() below.
*
* sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up()
* [S] p->on_rq = 1; [L] P->state
* UNLOCK rq->lock -----.
* \
* +--- RMB
* schedule() /
* LOCK rq->lock -----'
* UNLOCK rq->lock
* sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up()
* STORE p->on_rq = 1 LOAD p->state
* UNLOCK rq->lock
*
* __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
* LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb();
* smp_mb__after_spinlock();
* UNLOCK rq->lock
*
* [task p]
* [S] p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE [L] p->on_rq
* STORE p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE LOAD p->on_rq
*
* Pairs with the UNLOCK+LOCK on rq->lock from the
* last wakeup of our task and the schedule that got our task
* current.
* Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in
* __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock().
*/
smp_rmb();
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
@@ -2006,15 +2000,17 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
* One must be running (->on_cpu == 1) in order to remove oneself
* from the runqueue.
*
* [S] ->on_cpu = 1; [L] ->on_rq
* UNLOCK rq->lock
* RMB
* LOCK rq->lock
* [S] ->on_rq = 0; [L] ->on_cpu
* __schedule() (switch to task 'p') try_to_wake_up()
* STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->on_rq
* UNLOCK rq->lock
*
* Pairs with the full barrier implied in the UNLOCK+LOCK on rq->lock
* from the consecutive calls to schedule(); the first switching to our
* task, the second putting it to sleep.
* __schedule() (put 'p' to sleep)
* LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb();
* smp_mb__after_spinlock();
* STORE p->on_rq = 0 LOAD p->on_cpu
*
* Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in
* __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock().
*/
smp_rmb();
@@ -2120,8 +2116,7 @@ out:
*
* Return: 1 if the process was woken up, 0 if it was already running.
*
* It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
* changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
* This function executes a full memory barrier before accessing the task state.
*/
int wake_up_process(struct task_struct *p)
{

View File

@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static void __wake_up_common_lock(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int
* @nr_exclusive: how many wake-one or wake-many threads to wake up
* @key: is directly passed to the wakeup function
*
* It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
* changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
* If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before
* accessing the task state.
*/
void __wake_up(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int mode,
int nr_exclusive, void *key)
@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__wake_up_locked_key_bookmark);
*
* On UP it can prevent extra preemption.
*
* It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before
* changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up.
* If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before
* accessing the task state.
*/
void __wake_up_sync_key(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int mode,
int nr_exclusive, void *key)
@@ -392,35 +392,36 @@ static inline bool is_kthread_should_stop(void)
* if (condition)
* break;
*
* p->state = mode; condition = true;
* smp_mb(); // A smp_wmb(); // C
* if (!wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
* schedule() try_to_wake_up();
* p->state = TASK_RUNNING; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* wq_entry->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; condition = true;
* smp_mb() // B smp_wmb(); // C
* wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
* }
* remove_wait_queue(&wq_head, &wait);
* // in wait_woken() // in woken_wake_function()
*
* p->state = mode; wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
* smp_mb(); // A try_to_wake_up():
* if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN)) <full barrier>
* schedule() if (p->state & mode)
* p->state = TASK_RUNNING; p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
* wq_entry->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* smp_mb(); // B condition = true;
* } smp_mb(); // C
* remove_wait_queue(&wq_head, &wait); wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
*/
long wait_woken(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, long timeout)
{
set_current_state(mode); /* A */
/*
* The above implies an smp_mb(), which matches with the smp_wmb() from
* woken_wake_function() such that if we observe WQ_FLAG_WOKEN we must
* also observe all state before the wakeup.
* The below executes an smp_mb(), which matches with the full barrier
* executed by the try_to_wake_up() in woken_wake_function() such that
* either we see the store to wq_entry->flags in woken_wake_function()
* or woken_wake_function() sees our store to current->state.
*/
set_current_state(mode); /* A */
if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) && !is_kthread_should_stop())
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
/*
* The below implies an smp_mb(), it too pairs with the smp_wmb() from
* woken_wake_function() such that we must either observe the wait
* condition being true _OR_ WQ_FLAG_WOKEN such that we will not miss
* an event.
* The below executes an smp_mb(), which matches with the smp_mb() (C)
* in woken_wake_function() such that either we see the wait condition
* being true or the store to wq_entry->flags in woken_wake_function()
* follows ours in the coherence order.
*/
smp_store_mb(wq_entry->flags, wq_entry->flags & ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN); /* B */
@@ -430,14 +431,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_woken);
int woken_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
{
/*
* Although this function is called under waitqueue lock, LOCK
* doesn't imply write barrier and the users expects write
* barrier semantics on wakeup functions. The following
* smp_wmb() is equivalent to smp_wmb() in try_to_wake_up()
* and is paired with smp_store_mb() in wait_woken().
*/
smp_wmb(); /* C */
/* Pairs with the smp_store_mb() in wait_woken(). */
smp_mb(); /* C */
wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
return default_wake_function(wq_entry, mode, sync, key);