rcu: Tag callback lists with corresponding grace-period number
Currently, callbacks are advanced each time the corresponding CPU notices a change in its leaf rcu_node structure's ->completed value (this value counts grace-period completions). This approach has worked quite well, but with the advent of RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, we cannot count on a given CPU seeing all the grace-period completions. When a CPU misses a grace-period completion that occurs while it is in dyntick-idle mode, this will delay invocation of its callbacks. In addition, acceleration of callbacks (when RCU realizes that a given callback need only wait until the end of the next grace period, rather than having to wait for a partial grace period followed by a full grace period) must be carried out extremely carefully. Insufficient acceleration will result in unnecessarily long grace-period latencies, while excessive acceleration will result in premature callback invocation. Changes that involve this tradeoff are therefore among the most nerve-wracking changes to RCU. This commit therefore explicitly tags groups of callbacks with the number of the grace period that they are waiting for. This means that callback-advancement and callback-acceleration functions are idempotent, so that excessive acceleration will merely waste a few CPU cycles. This also allows a CPU to take full advantage of any grace periods that have elapsed while it has been in dyntick-idle mode. It should also enable simulataneous simplifications to and optimizations of RCU_FAST_NO_HZ. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ struct rcu_data {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rcu_head *nxtlist;
|
||||
struct rcu_head **nxttail[RCU_NEXT_SIZE];
|
||||
unsigned long nxtcompleted[RCU_NEXT_SIZE];
|
||||
/* grace periods for sublists. */
|
||||
long qlen_lazy; /* # of lazy queued callbacks */
|
||||
long qlen; /* # of queued callbacks, incl lazy */
|
||||
long qlen_last_fqs_check;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user