locking/lockdep: Rework FS_RECLAIM annotation
A while ago someone, and I cannot find the email just now, asked if we could not implement the RECLAIM_FS inversion stuff with a 'fake' lock like we use for other things like workqueues etc. I think this should be possible which allows reducing the 'irq' states and will reduce the amount of __bfs() lookups we do. Removing the 1 IRQ state results in 4 less __bfs() walks per dependency, improving lockdep performance. And by moving this annotation out of the lockdep code it becomes easier for the mm people to extend. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
a9668cd6ee
commit
d92a8cfcb3
13
mm/vmscan.c
13
mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3525,8 +3525,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
|
||||
};
|
||||
const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
|
||||
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask);
|
||||
current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
|
||||
@@ -3585,14 +3583,15 @@ kswapd_try_sleep:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
trace_mm_vmscan_kswapd_wake(pgdat->node_id, classzone_idx,
|
||||
alloc_order);
|
||||
fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
reclaim_order = balance_pgdat(pgdat, alloc_order, classzone_idx);
|
||||
fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (reclaim_order < alloc_order)
|
||||
goto kswapd_try_sleep;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD);
|
||||
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
|
||||
lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3655,14 +3654,14 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
|
||||
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
|
||||
|
||||
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
|
||||
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
|
||||
fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
|
||||
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
|
||||
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
|
||||
|
||||
nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
|
||||
|
||||
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
|
||||
lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
|
||||
fs_reclaim_release(sc.gfp_mask);
|
||||
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
|
||||
|
||||
return nr_reclaimed;
|
||||
@@ -3847,7 +3846,7 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
|
||||
*/
|
||||
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
|
||||
p->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE;
|
||||
lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
|
||||
fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
|
||||
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
|
||||
p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3862,9 +3861,9 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
p->reclaim_state = NULL;
|
||||
fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
|
||||
current->flags &= ~PF_SWAPWRITE;
|
||||
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
|
||||
lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
|
||||
return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user