xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Add tests for PTR_TO_BTF_ID vs. null comparison

Browse Source 
Add two tests for PTR_TO_BTF_ID vs. null ptr comparison,
one for PTR_TO_BTF_ID in the ctx structure and the
other for PTR_TO_BTF_ID after one level pointer chasing.
In both cases, the test ensures condition is not
removed.

For example, for this test
 struct bpf_fentry_test_t {
     struct bpf_fentry_test_t *a;
 };
 int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
 {
     if (arg == 0)
         test7_result = 1;
     return 0;
 }
Before the previous verifier change, we have xlated codes:
  int test7(long long unsigned int * ctx):
  ; int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
     0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
  ; int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
     1: (b4) w0 = 0
     2: (95) exit
After the previous verifier change, we have:
  int test7(long long unsigned int * ctx):
  ; int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
     0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
  ; if (arg == 0)
     1: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+4
  ; test7_result = 1;
     2: (18) r1 = map[id:6][0]+48
     4: (b7) r2 = 1
     5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r2
  ; int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
     6: (b4) w0 = 0
     7: (95) exit

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200630171241.2523875-1-yhs@fb.com
This commit is contained in:
Yonghong Song
2020-06-30 10:12:41 -07:00
committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent 01c66c48d4
commit d923021c2c
4 changed files with 63 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void test_fentry_fexit(void)
fentry_res = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss;
fexit_res = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss;
printf("%lld\n", fentry_skel->bss->test1_result);
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
CHECK(fentry_res[i] != 1, "result",
"fentry_test%d failed err %lld\n", i + 1, fentry_res[i]);
CHECK(fexit_res[i] != 1, "result",

22
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
View File

@@ -55,3 +55,25 @@ int BPF_PROG(test6, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void * e, __u64 f)
e == (void *)20 && f == 21;
return 0;
}
struct bpf_fentry_test_t {
struct bpf_fentry_test_t *a;
};
__u64 test7_result = 0;
SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test7")
int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
if (arg == 0)
test7_result = 1;
return 0;
}
__u64 test8_result = 0;
SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test8")
int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
if (arg->a == 0)
test8_result = 1;
return 0;
}

22
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c
View File

@@ -56,3 +56,25 @@ int BPF_PROG(test6, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, __u64 f, int ret)
e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && ret == 111;
return 0;
}
struct bpf_fentry_test_t {
struct bpf_fentry_test *a;
};
__u64 test7_result = 0;
SEC("fexit/bpf_fentry_test7")
int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
if (arg == 0)
test7_result = 1;
return 0;
}
__u64 test8_result = 0;
SEC("fexit/bpf_fentry_test8")
int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
{
if (arg->a == 0)
test8_result = 1;
return 0;
}