clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock runs in suspend

The ARM specifies that the system counter "must be implemented in an
always-on power domain," and so we try to use the counter as a source of
timekeeping across suspend/resume. Unfortunately, some SoCs (e.g.,
Rockchip's RK3399) do not keep the counter ticking properly when
switched from their high-power clock to the lower-power clock used in
system suspend. Support this quirk by adding a new device tree property.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Этот коммит содержится в:
Brian Norris
2016-10-04 11:12:09 -07:00
коммит произвёл Daniel Lezcano
родитель baa73d9e47
Коммит d8ec7595a0
2 изменённых файлов: 13 добавлений и 1 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ to deliver its interrupts via SPIs.
architecturally-defined reset values. Only supported for 32-bit
systems which follow the ARMv7 architected reset values.
- arm,no-tick-in-suspend : The main counter does not tick when the system is in
low-power system suspend on some SoCs. This behavior does not match the
Architecture Reference Manual's specification that the system counter "must
be implemented in an always-on power domain."
Example: