sched/core: Add wrappers for lockdep_(un)pin_lock()
In preparation for adding diagnostic checks to catch missing calls to update_rq_clock(), provide wrappers for (re)pinning and unpinning rq->lock. Because the pending diagnostic checks allow state to be maintained in rq_flags across pin contexts, swap the 'struct pin_cookie' arguments for 'struct rq_flags *'. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-5-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

orang tua
c8d7dabf8f
melakukan
d8ac897137
@@ -6213,7 +6213,7 @@ preempt:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct task_struct *
|
||||
pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie)
|
||||
pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se;
|
||||
@@ -6326,9 +6326,9 @@ idle:
|
||||
* further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to
|
||||
* re-start the picking loop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie);
|
||||
rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
|
||||
new_tasks = idle_balance(rq);
|
||||
lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie);
|
||||
rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Because idle_balance() releases (and re-acquires) rq->lock, it is
|
||||
* possible for any higher priority task to appear. In that case we
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user