HID: use hid_hw_request() instead of direct call to usbhid

This allows the hid drivers to be independent from the transport layer.

The patch was constructed by replacing all occurences of
usbhid_submit_report() by its hid_hw_request() counterpart.
Then, drivers not requiring USB_HID anymore have their USB_HID
dependency cleaned in the Kconfig file.

Finally, few drivers still depends on USB_HID. Many of them
are requiring the io wait callback. They are found in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

For the sensor-hub part:
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

drivers/hid/hid-zpff.c

@@ -24,13 +24,11 @@
 #include <linux/hid.h>
 #include <linux/input.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/usb.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include "hid-ids.h"
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZEROPLUS_FF
-#include "usbhid/usbhid.h"
 
 struct zpff_device {
 	struct hid_report *report;
@@ -59,7 +57,7 @@ static int zpff_play(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
 	zpff->report->field[2]->value[0] = left;
 	zpff->report->field[3]->value[0] = right;
 	dbg_hid("running with 0x%02x 0x%02x\n", left, right);
-	usbhid_submit_report(hid, zpff->report, USB_DIR_OUT);
+	hid_hw_request(hid, zpff->report, HID_REQ_SET_REPORT);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -104,7 +102,7 @@ static int zpff_init(struct hid_device *hid)
 	zpff->report->field[1]->value[0] = 0x02;
 	zpff->report->field[2]->value[0] = 0x00;
 	zpff->report->field[3]->value[0] = 0x00;
-	usbhid_submit_report(hid, zpff->report, USB_DIR_OUT);
+	hid_hw_request(hid, zpff->report, HID_REQ_SET_REPORT);
 
 	hid_info(hid, "force feedback for Zeroplus based devices by Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@gmail.com>\n");