um: don't bother blocking SIGARLM and SIGUSR1
We used to generate those, but we hadn't done that for a long time. No need to bother blocking them for signal handlers. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Richard Weinberger

parent
9b25fcbdc6
commit
d5c7e8b4ec
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc)
|
||||
void timer_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_handler(SIGVTALRM, (__sighandler_t) alarm_handler,
|
||||
SA_ONSTACK | SA_RESTART, SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, -1);
|
||||
SA_ONSTACK | SA_RESTART, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void set_sigstack(void *sig_stack, int size)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user