cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -29,15 +29,9 @@ static unsigned int cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
|
||||
static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
|
||||
reg_clkgen_rw_clk_ctrl clk_ctrl;
|
||||
clk_ctrl = REG_RD(clkgen, regi_clkgen, rw_clk_ctrl);
|
||||
|
||||
freqs.old = cris_freq_get_cpu_frequency(policy->cpu);
|
||||
freqs.new = cris_freq_table[state].frequency;
|
||||
|
||||
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Even though we may be SMP they will share the same clock
|
||||
@@ -50,8 +44,6 @@ static int cris_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int state)
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_enable();
|
||||
|
||||
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user