gpio: doc updates
There's been some recent confusion about error checking GPIO numbers. briefly, it should be handled mostly during setup, when gpio_request() is called, and NEVER by expectig gpio_is_valid to report more than never-usable GPIO numbers. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: terminate unterminated comment] Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: Eric Miao" <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Cc: "Ryan Mallon" <ryan@bluewatersys.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Linus Torvalds

parent
5affb60772
commit
c956126c13
@@ -109,17 +109,19 @@ use numbers 2000-2063 to identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to initialize a structure with an invalid GPIO number, use
|
||||
some negative number (perhaps "-EINVAL"); that will never be valid. To
|
||||
test if a number could reference a GPIO, you may use this predicate:
|
||||
test if such number from such a structure could reference a GPIO, you
|
||||
may use this predicate:
|
||||
|
||||
int gpio_is_valid(int number);
|
||||
|
||||
A number that's not valid will be rejected by calls which may request
|
||||
or free GPIOs (see below). Other numbers may also be rejected; for
|
||||
example, a number might be valid but unused on a given board.
|
||||
|
||||
Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is currently a
|
||||
platform-specific implementation issue.
|
||||
example, a number might be valid but temporarily unused on a given board.
|
||||
|
||||
Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is a platform-specific
|
||||
implementation issue, as are whether that support can leave "holes" in the space
|
||||
of GPIO numbers, and whether new controllers can be added at runtime. Such issues
|
||||
can affect things including whether adjacent GPIO numbers are both valid.
|
||||
|
||||
Using GPIOs
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
@@ -480,12 +482,16 @@ To support this framework, a platform's Kconfig will "select" either
|
||||
ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB or ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
|
||||
and arrange that its <asm/gpio.h> includes <asm-generic/gpio.h> and defines
|
||||
three functions: gpio_get_value(), gpio_set_value(), and gpio_cansleep().
|
||||
They may also want to provide a custom value for ARCH_NR_GPIOS.
|
||||
|
||||
ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB means that the gpio-lib code will always get compiled
|
||||
It may also provide a custom value for ARCH_NR_GPIOS, so that it better
|
||||
reflects the number of GPIOs in actual use on that platform, without
|
||||
wasting static table space. (It should count both built-in/SoC GPIOs and
|
||||
also ones on GPIO expanders.
|
||||
|
||||
ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB means that the gpiolib code will always get compiled
|
||||
into the kernel on that architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB means the gpio-lib code defaults to off and the user
|
||||
ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB means the gpiolib code defaults to off and the user
|
||||
can enable it and build it into the kernel optionally.
|
||||
|
||||
If neither of these options are selected, the platform does not support
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user