[PATCH] can_share_swap_page: use page_mapcount
Remember that ironic get_user_pages race? when the raised page_count on a page swapped out led do_wp_page to decide that it had to copy on write, so substituted a different page into userspace. 2.6.7 onwards have Andrea's solution, where try_to_unmap_one backs out if it finds page_count raised. Which works, but is unsatisfying (rmap.c has no other page_count heuristics), and was found a few months ago to hang an intensive page migration test. A year ago I was hesitant to engage page_mapcount, now it seems the right fix. So remove the page_count hack from try_to_unmap_one; and use activate_page in unuse_mm when dropping lock, to replace its secondary effect of helping swapoff to make progress in that case. Simplify can_share_swap_page (now called only on anonymous pages) to check page_mapcount + page_swapcount == 1: still needs the page lock to stabilize their (pessimistic) sum, but does not need swapper_space.tree_lock for that. In do_swap_page, move swap_free and unlock_page below page_add_anon_rmap, to keep sum on the high side, and correct when can_share_swap_page called. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
此提交包含在:
@@ -276,61 +276,37 @@ void swap_free(swp_entry_t entry)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if we're the only user of a swap page,
|
||||
* when the page is locked.
|
||||
* How many references to page are currently swapped out?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int exclusive_swap_page(struct page *page)
|
||||
static inline int page_swapcount(struct page *page)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval = 0;
|
||||
struct swap_info_struct * p;
|
||||
int count = 0;
|
||||
struct swap_info_struct *p;
|
||||
swp_entry_t entry;
|
||||
|
||||
entry.val = page->private;
|
||||
p = swap_info_get(entry);
|
||||
if (p) {
|
||||
/* Is the only swap cache user the cache itself? */
|
||||
if (p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)] == 1) {
|
||||
/* Recheck the page count with the swapcache lock held.. */
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
|
||||
if (page_count(page) == 2)
|
||||
retval = 1;
|
||||
write_unlock_irq(&swapper_space.tree_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Subtract the 1 for the swap cache itself */
|
||||
count = p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)] - 1;
|
||||
swap_info_put(p);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
return count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can use this swap cache entry directly
|
||||
* if there are no other references to it.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Here "exclusive_swap_page()" does the real
|
||||
* work, but we opportunistically check whether
|
||||
* we need to get all the locks first..
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int can_share_swap_page(struct page *page)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval = 0;
|
||||
int count;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!PageLocked(page))
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
switch (page_count(page)) {
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
if (!PagePrivate(page))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* Fallthrough */
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
if (!PageSwapCache(page))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
retval = exclusive_swap_page(page);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
if (PageReserved(page))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
retval = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
|
||||
count = page_mapcount(page);
|
||||
if (count <= 1 && PageSwapCache(page))
|
||||
count += page_swapcount(page);
|
||||
return count == 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -529,9 +505,10 @@ static int unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
||||
|
||||
if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Our reference to the page stops try_to_unmap_one from
|
||||
* unmapping its ptes, so swapoff can make progress.
|
||||
* Activate page so shrink_cache is unlikely to unmap its
|
||||
* ptes while lock is dropped, so swapoff can make progress.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
activate_page(page);
|
||||
unlock_page(page);
|
||||
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
||||
lock_page(page);
|
||||
|
新增問題並參考
封鎖使用者