[XFS] We really suck at spulling. Thanks to Chris Pascoe for fixing all

these typos.

SGI-PV: 904196
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25539a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>

fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot_item.c

@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqunpin_wait(
  * as possible.
  *
  * We must not be holding the AIL_LOCK at this point. Calling incore() to
- * search the buffercache can be a time consuming thing, and AIL_LOCK is a
+ * search the buffer cache can be a time consuming thing, and AIL_LOCK is a
  * spinlock.
  */
 STATIC void

fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c

@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ xfs_qm_rele_quotafs_ref(
 
 /*
  * This is called at mount time from xfs_mountfs to initialize the quotainfo
- * structure and start the global quotamanager (xfs_Gqm) if it hasn't done
+ * structure and start the global quota manager (xfs_Gqm) if it hasn't done
  * so already.	Note that the superblock has not been read in yet.
  */
 void
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqattach_one(
  * Given a udquot and gdquot, attach a ptr to the group dquot in the
  * udquot as a hint for future lookups. The idea sounds simple, but the
  * execution isn't, because the udquot might have a group dquot attached
- * already and getting rid of that gets us into lock ordering contraints.
+ * already and getting rid of that gets us into lock ordering constraints.
  * The process is complicated more by the fact that the dquots may or may not
  * be locked on entry.
  */
@@ -1094,10 +1094,10 @@ xfs_qm_sync(
 			}
 			/*
 			 * If we can't grab the flush lock then if the caller
-			 * really wanted us to give this our best shot,
+			 * really wanted us to give this our best shot, so
 			 * see if we can give a push to the buffer before we wait
 			 * on the flush lock. At this point, we know that
-			 * eventhough the dquot is being flushed,
+			 * even though the dquot is being flushed,
 			 * it has (new) dirty data.
 			 */
 			xfs_qm_dqflock_pushbuf_wait(dqp);
@@ -1491,7 +1491,7 @@ xfs_qm_reset_dqcounts(
 		/*
 		 * Do a sanity check, and if needed, repair the dqblk. Don't
 		 * output any warnings because it's perfectly possible to
-		 * find unitialized dquot blks. See comment in xfs_qm_dqcheck.
+		 * find uninitialised dquot blks. See comment in xfs_qm_dqcheck.
 		 */
 		(void) xfs_qm_dqcheck(ddq, id+j, type, XFS_QMOPT_DQREPAIR,
 				      "xfs_quotacheck");
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqiterate(
 
 	error = 0;
 	/*
-	 * This looks racey, but we can't keep an inode lock across a
+	 * This looks racy, but we can't keep an inode lock across a
 	 * trans_reserve. But, this gets called during quotacheck, and that
 	 * happens only at mount time which is single threaded.
 	 */
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ xfs_qm_dqusage_adjust(
 	 * we have to start from the beginning anyway.
 	 * Once we're done, we'll log all the dquot bufs.
 	 *
-	 * The *QUOTA_ON checks below may look pretty racey, but quotachecks
+	 * The *QUOTA_ON checks below may look pretty racy, but quotachecks
 	 * and quotaoffs don't race. (Quotachecks happen at mount time only).
 	 */
 	if (XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp)) {

fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm_syscalls.c

@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ xfs_qm_export_dquot(
 
 	/*
 	 * Internally, we don't reset all the timers when quota enforcement
-	 * gets turned off. No need to confuse the userlevel code,
+	 * gets turned off. No need to confuse the user level code,
 	 * so return zeroes in that case.
 	 */
 	if (! XFS_IS_QUOTA_ENFORCED(mp)) {

fs/xfs/quota/xfs_trans_dquot.c

@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ xfs_trans_reserve_quota_bydquots(
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Didnt change anything critical, so, no need to log
+	 * Didn't change anything critical, so, no need to log
 	 */
 	return (0);
 }