rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs
Binding the grace-period kthreads to the timekeeping CPU resulted in significant performance decreases for some workloads. For more detail, see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/395 for benchmark numbers https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/218 for CPU statistics It turns out that it is necessary to bind the grace-period kthreads to the timekeeping CPU only when all but CPU 0 is a nohz_full CPU on the one hand or if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y on the other. In other cases, it suffices to bind the grace-period kthreads to the set of non-nohz_full CPUs. This commit therefore creates a tick_nohz_not_full_mask that is the complement of tick_nohz_full_mask, and then binds the grace-period kthread to the set of CPUs indicated by this new mask, which covers the CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=n case. The CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y case still binds the grace-period kthreads to the timekeeping CPU. This commit also includes the tick_nohz_full_enabled() check suggested by Frederic Weisbecker. Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Created housekeeping_affine() and housekeeping_mask per fweisbec feedback. ]
This commit is contained in:
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static void tick_sched_handle(struct tick_sched *ts, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
|
||||
cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
|
||||
cpumask_var_t housekeeping_mask;
|
||||
bool tick_nohz_full_running;
|
||||
|
||||
static bool can_stop_full_tick(void)
|
||||
@@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&tick_nohz_full_mask);
|
||||
alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&housekeeping_mask);
|
||||
if (cpulist_parse(str, tick_nohz_full_mask) < 0) {
|
||||
pr_warning("NOHZ: Incorrect nohz_full cpumask\n");
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
@@ -291,6 +293,8 @@ static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
|
||||
pr_warning("NO_HZ: Clearing %d from nohz_full range for timekeeping\n", cpu);
|
||||
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_mask,
|
||||
cpu_possible_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
|
||||
tick_nohz_full_running = true;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
@@ -332,9 +336,15 @@ static int tick_nohz_init_all(void)
|
||||
pr_err("NO_HZ: Can't allocate full dynticks cpumask\n");
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&housekeeping_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
|
||||
pr_err("NO_HZ: Can't allocate not-full dynticks cpumask\n");
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
err = 0;
|
||||
cpumask_setall(tick_nohz_full_mask);
|
||||
cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_full_mask);
|
||||
cpumask_clear(housekeeping_mask);
|
||||
cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), housekeeping_mask);
|
||||
tick_nohz_full_running = true;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user