Revert "ti-st: add device tree support"

This reverts commit 46d0d33350.

This binding is horrible and never should have been merged. It is not
documented nor are there any in tree users, so reverting it will not
break anything we care about. Lets revert it before we do have users.

The problems with it are:

- It is not documented.

- The GPIO connection is described with a custom property and uses Linux
GPIO numbering.

- The UART connection is described using the Linux tty device name.

Cc: Gigi Joseph <gigi.joseph@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Rob Herring
2015-07-22 13:17:15 -05:00
committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent eb79100fe6
commit c0bd1b9e58
3 changed files with 9 additions and 103 deletions

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#include <linux/ti_wilink_st.h>
/**********************************************************************/
/* internal functions */
static void send_ll_cmd(struct st_data_s *st_data,
unsigned char cmd)
@@ -54,13 +53,7 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_sleep(struct st_data_s *st_data)
/* communicate to platform about chip asleep */
kim_data = st_data->kim_data;
if (kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.of_node) {
pr_debug("use device tree data");
pdata = dt_pdata;
} else {
pdata = kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.platform_data;
}
pdata = kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.platform_data;
if (pdata->chip_asleep)
pdata->chip_asleep(NULL);
}
@@ -93,13 +86,7 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct st_data_s *st_data)
/* communicate to platform about chip wakeup */
kim_data = st_data->kim_data;
if (kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.of_node) {
pr_debug("use device tree data");
pdata = dt_pdata;
} else {
pdata = kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.platform_data;
}
pdata = kim_data->kim_pdev->dev.platform_data;
if (pdata->chip_awake)
pdata->chip_awake(NULL);
}