Spelling fix: explicitly

From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
这个提交包含在:
Jean Delvare
2007-10-19 23:22:55 +02:00
提交者 Adrian Bunk
父节点 db955170d4
当前提交 c03983ac9b
修改 19 个文件,包含 23 行新增23 行删除

查看文件

@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWB_SCR SYM_FWB_SCR = {
* While testing with bogus QUANTUM drives, the C1010
* sometimes raised a spurious phase mismatch with
* WSR and the CHMOV(1) triggered another PM.
* Waiting explicitely for the PHASE seemed to avoid
* Waiting explicitly for the PHASE seemed to avoid
* the nested phase mismatch. Btw, this didn't happen
* using my IBM drives.
*/

查看文件

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
#define WD33C93_FS_12_15 OWNID_FS_12
#define WD33C93_FS_16_20 OWNID_FS_16
/* pass input-clock explicitely. accepted mhz values are 8-10,12-20 */
/* pass input-clock explicitly. accepted mhz values are 8-10,12-20 */
#define WD33C93_FS_MHZ(mhz) (mhz)
/* Control register */