Spelling fix: explicitly
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
这个提交包含在:
@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWB_SCR SYM_FWB_SCR = {
|
||||
* While testing with bogus QUANTUM drives, the C1010
|
||||
* sometimes raised a spurious phase mismatch with
|
||||
* WSR and the CHMOV(1) triggered another PM.
|
||||
* Waiting explicitely for the PHASE seemed to avoid
|
||||
* Waiting explicitly for the PHASE seemed to avoid
|
||||
* the nested phase mismatch. Btw, this didn't happen
|
||||
* using my IBM drives.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
|
||||
#define WD33C93_FS_12_15 OWNID_FS_12
|
||||
#define WD33C93_FS_16_20 OWNID_FS_16
|
||||
|
||||
/* pass input-clock explicitely. accepted mhz values are 8-10,12-20 */
|
||||
/* pass input-clock explicitly. accepted mhz values are 8-10,12-20 */
|
||||
#define WD33C93_FS_MHZ(mhz) (mhz)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Control register */
|
||||
|
在新工单中引用
屏蔽一个用户