netlink: add mask validation
We don't have good validation policy for existing unsigned int attrs which serve as flags (for new ones we could use NLA_BITFIELD32). With increased use of policy dumping having the validation be expressed as part of the policy is important. Add validation policy in form of a mask of supported/valid bits. Support u64 in the uAPI to be future-proof, but really for now the embedded mask member can only hold 32 bits, so anything with bit 32+ set will always fail validation. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
David S. Miller

parent
ddcf3b70c5
commit
bdbb4e29df
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ enum nla_policy_validation {
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_WARN_TOO_LONG,
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_MIN,
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_MAX,
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_MASK,
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_RANGE_PTR,
|
||||
NLA_VALIDATE_FUNCTION,
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -317,6 +318,7 @@ struct nla_policy {
|
||||
u16 len;
|
||||
union {
|
||||
const u32 bitfield32_valid;
|
||||
const u32 mask;
|
||||
const char *reject_message;
|
||||
const struct nla_policy *nested_policy;
|
||||
struct netlink_range_validation *range;
|
||||
@@ -368,6 +370,8 @@ struct nla_policy {
|
||||
(tp == NLA_S8 || tp == NLA_S16 || tp == NLA_S32 || tp == NLA_S64)
|
||||
|
||||
#define __NLA_ENSURE(condition) BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!(condition))
|
||||
#define NLA_ENSURE_UINT_TYPE(tp) \
|
||||
(__NLA_ENSURE(__NLA_IS_UINT_TYPE(tp)) + tp)
|
||||
#define NLA_ENSURE_UINT_OR_BINARY_TYPE(tp) \
|
||||
(__NLA_ENSURE(__NLA_IS_UINT_TYPE(tp) || \
|
||||
tp == NLA_MSECS || \
|
||||
@@ -416,6 +420,12 @@ struct nla_policy {
|
||||
.max = _max, \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define NLA_POLICY_MASK(tp, _mask) { \
|
||||
.type = NLA_ENSURE_UINT_TYPE(tp), \
|
||||
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_MASK, \
|
||||
.mask = _mask, \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define NLA_POLICY_VALIDATE_FN(tp, fn, ...) { \
|
||||
.type = NLA_ENSURE_NO_VALIDATION_PTR(tp), \
|
||||
.validation_type = NLA_VALIDATE_FUNCTION, \
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user