VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb)
Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A | -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) | -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) | -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) | -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) | -A || (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A || sb_rdonly(SB) | -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A | -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A | -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A | -(sb_rdonly(SB)) || A +sb_rdonly(SB) || A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) | -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) | -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ int reiserfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
|
||||
struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
|
||||
int jbegin_count = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
|
||||
if (sb_rdonly(inode->i_sb))
|
||||
return -EROFS;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* memory pressure can sometimes initiate write_inode calls with
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user