locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail
In commit:659cf9f582
("locking/ww_mutex: Optimize ww-mutexes by waking at most one waiter for backoff when acquiring the lock") I replaced a comment with a lockdep_assert_held(). However it turns out we hide that lock from lockdep for hysterical raisins, which results in the assertion always firing. Remove the old debug code as lockdep will easily spot the abuse it was meant to catch, which will make the lock visible to lockdep and make the assertion work as intended. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nicolai Haehnle <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes:659cf9f582
("locking/ww_mutex: Optimize ww-mutexes by waking at most one waiter for backoff when acquiring the lock") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170117150609.GB32474@worktop Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Ingo Molnar

parent
4009f4b3a9
commit
b9c16a0e1f
@@ -9,10 +9,6 @@
|
||||
* !CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES case. Most of them are NOPs:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define spin_lock_mutex(lock, flags) \
|
||||
do { spin_lock(lock); (void)(flags); } while (0)
|
||||
#define spin_unlock_mutex(lock, flags) \
|
||||
do { spin_unlock(lock); (void)(flags); } while (0)
|
||||
#define mutex_remove_waiter(lock, waiter, task) \
|
||||
__list_del((waiter)->list.prev, (waiter)->list.next)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user