xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

perf, core: Rate limit perf_sched_events jump_label patching

Browse Source 
jump_lable patching is very expensive operation that involves pausing all
cpus. The patching of perf_sched_events jump_label is easily controllable
from userspace by unprivileged user.

When te user runs a loop like this:

  "while true; do perf stat -e cycles true; done"

... the performance of my test application that just increments a counter
for one second drops by 4%.

This is on a 16 cpu box with my test application using only one of
them. An impact on a real server doing real work will be worse.

Performance of KVM PMU drops nearly 50% due to jump_lable for "perf
record" since KVM PMU implementation creates and destroys perf event
frequently.

This patch introduces a way to rate limit jump_label patching and uses
it to fix the above problem.

I believe that as jump_label use will spread the problem will become more
common and thus solving it in a generic code is appropriate. Also fixing
it in the perf code would result in moving jump_label accounting logic to
perf code with all the ifdefs in case of JUMP_LABEL=n kernel. With this
patch all details are nicely hidden inside jump_label code.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111127155909.GO2557@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Gleb Natapov
2011-11-27 17:59:09 +02:00
committed by Ingo Molnar
parent b79387ef18
commit b202952075
4 changed files with 68 additions and 10 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
include/linux/perf_event.h
View File

@@ -1064,12 +1064,12 @@ perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr)
}
}
extern struct jump_label_key perf_sched_events;
extern struct jump_label_key_deferred perf_sched_events;
static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *task)
{
if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events))
if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events.key))
__perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
}
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
{
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, NULL, 0);
if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events))
if (static_branch(&perf_sched_events.key))
__perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
}