x86, efi: Add dedicated EFI stub entry point
The method used to work out whether we were booted by EFI firmware or via a boot loader is broken. Because efi_main() is always executed when booting from a boot loader we will dereference invalid pointers either on the stack (CONFIG_X86_32) or contained in %rdx (CONFIG_X86_64) when searching for an EFI System Table signature. Instead of dereferencing these invalid system table pointers, add a new entry point that is only used when booting from EFI firmware, when we know the pointer arguments will be valid. With this change legacy boot loaders will no longer execute efi_main(), but will instead skip EFI stub initialisation completely. [ hpa: Marking this for urgent/stable since it is a regression when the option is enabled; without the option the patch has no effect ] Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.hfleming@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1334584744.26997.14.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com Reported-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.3
This commit is contained in:

committed by
H. Peter Anvin

orang tua
d7de8649f3
melakukan
b1994304fc
@@ -200,18 +200,28 @@ ENTRY(startup_64)
|
||||
* entire text+data+bss and hopefully all of memory.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
|
||||
pushq %rsi
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The entry point for the PE/COFF executable is 0x210, so only
|
||||
* legacy boot loaders will execute this jmp.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
jmp preferred_addr
|
||||
|
||||
.org 0x210
|
||||
mov %rcx, %rdi
|
||||
mov %rdx, %rsi
|
||||
call efi_main
|
||||
popq %rsi
|
||||
cmpq $0,%rax
|
||||
je preferred_addr
|
||||
movq %rax,%rsi
|
||||
call 1f
|
||||
cmpq $0,%rax
|
||||
jne 2f
|
||||
1:
|
||||
/* EFI init failed, so hang. */
|
||||
hlt
|
||||
jmp 1b
|
||||
2:
|
||||
call 3f
|
||||
3:
|
||||
popq %rax
|
||||
subq $1b, %rax
|
||||
subq $3b, %rax
|
||||
subq BP_pref_address(%rsi), %rax
|
||||
add BP_code32_start(%esi), %eax
|
||||
leaq preferred_addr(%rax), %rax
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user