[SPARC64]: Fix request_irq() ignored result warnings in PCI controller code.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
David S. Miller
2007-05-08 17:23:31 -07:00
bovenliggende c57c2ffb15
commit af80318eb7
3 gewijzigde bestanden met toevoegingen van 102 en 44 verwijderingen

Bestand weergeven

@@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ static void psycho_register_error_handlers(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
struct of_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(pbm->prom_node);
unsigned long base = pbm->controller_regs;
u64 tmp;
int err;
if (!op)
return;
@@ -852,12 +853,27 @@ static void psycho_register_error_handlers(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
if (op->num_irqs < 6)
return;
request_irq(op->irqs[1], psycho_ue_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_UE", pbm);
request_irq(op->irqs[2], psycho_ce_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_CE", pbm);
request_irq(op->irqs[0], psycho_pcierr_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_PCIERR", pbm);
/* We really mean to ignore the return result here. Two
* PCI controller share the same interrupt numbers and
* drive the same front-end hardware. Whichever of the
* two get in here first will register the IRQ handler
* the second will just error out since we do not pass in
* IRQF_SHARED.
*/
err = request_irq(op->irqs[1], psycho_ue_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_UE", pbm);
err = request_irq(op->irqs[2], psycho_ce_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_CE", pbm);
/* This one, however, ought not to fail. We can just warn
* about it since the system can still operate properly even
* if this fails.
*/
err = request_irq(op->irqs[0], psycho_pcierr_intr, 0,
"PSYCHO_PCIERR", pbm);
if (err)
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Could not register PCIERR, "
"err=%d\n", pbm->name, err);
/* Enable UE and CE interrupts for controller. */
psycho_write(base + PSYCHO_ECC_CTRL,