[SCSI] sas: unify the pointlessly separated enums sas_dev_type and sas_device_type
These enums have been separate since the dawn of SAS, mainly because the latter is a procotol only enum and the former includes additional state for libsas. The dichotomy causes endless confusion about which one you should use where and leads to pointless warnings like this: drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c: In function 'mvs_update_phyinfo': drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c:1162:34: warning: comparison between 'enum sas_device_type' and 'enum sas_dev_type' [-Wenum-compare] Fix by eliminating one of them. The one kept is effectively the sas.h one, but call it sas_device_type and make sure the enums are all properly namespaced with the SAS_ prefix. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -131,16 +131,16 @@ static inline void sas_fill_in_rphy(struct domain_device *dev,
|
||||
rphy->identify.initiator_port_protocols = dev->iproto;
|
||||
rphy->identify.target_port_protocols = dev->tproto;
|
||||
switch (dev->dev_type) {
|
||||
case SATA_DEV:
|
||||
case SAS_SATA_DEV:
|
||||
/* FIXME: need sata device type */
|
||||
case SAS_END_DEV:
|
||||
case SATA_PENDING:
|
||||
case SAS_END_DEVICE:
|
||||
case SAS_SATA_PENDING:
|
||||
rphy->identify.device_type = SAS_END_DEVICE;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case EDGE_DEV:
|
||||
case SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE:
|
||||
rphy->identify.device_type = SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case FANOUT_DEV:
|
||||
case SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE:
|
||||
rphy->identify.device_type = SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user