rseq: Remove broken uapi field layout on 32-bit little endian
[ Upstream commit bfdf4e6208051ed7165b2e92035b4bf11f43eb63 ]
The rseq rseq_cs.ptr.{ptr32,padding} uapi endianness handling is
entirely wrong on 32-bit little endian: a preprocessor logic mistake
wrongly uses the big endian field layout on 32-bit little endian
architectures.
Fortunately, those ptr32 accessors were never used within the kernel,
and only meant as a convenience for user-space.
Remove those and replace the whole rseq_cs union by a __u64 type, as
this is the only thing really needed to express the ABI. Document how
32-bit architectures are meant to interact with this field.
Fixes: ec9c82e03a
("rseq: uapi: Declare rseq_cs field as union, update includes")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220127152720.25898-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman

parent
f0250e05e5
commit
a9faa5beda
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ static int rseq_get_rseq_cs(struct task_struct *t, struct rseq_cs *rseq_cs)
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
|
||||
if (get_user(ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs.ptr64))
|
||||
if (get_user(ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
if (copy_from_user(&ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs.ptr64, sizeof(ptr)))
|
||||
if (copy_from_user(&ptr, &t->rseq->rseq_cs, sizeof(ptr)))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (!ptr) {
|
||||
@@ -210,9 +210,9 @@ static int clear_rseq_cs(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
* Set rseq_cs to NULL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
|
||||
return put_user(0UL, &t->rseq->rseq_cs.ptr64);
|
||||
return put_user(0UL, &t->rseq->rseq_cs);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
if (clear_user(&t->rseq->rseq_cs.ptr64, sizeof(t->rseq->rseq_cs.ptr64)))
|
||||
if (clear_user(&t->rseq->rseq_cs, sizeof(t->rseq->rseq_cs)))
|
||||
return -EFAULT;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user