netpoll: Remove gfp parameter from __netpoll_setup

The gfp parameter was added in:
commit 47be03a28c
Author: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 10 01:24:37 2012 +0000

    netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup()

    slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called
    with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
    memory. Eric suggested to pass gfp flags to __netpoll_setup().

    Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
    Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
    Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The reason for the gfp parameter was removed in:
commit c4cdef9b71
Author: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue Jul 23 15:25:27 2013 +0800

    bonding: don't call slave_xxx_netpoll under spinlocks

    The slave_xxx_netpoll will call synchronize_rcu_bh(),
    so the function may schedule and sleep, it should't be
    called under spinlocks.

    bond_netpoll_setup() and bond_netpoll_cleanup() are always
    protected by rtnl lock, it is no need to take the read lock,
    as the slave list couldn't be changed outside rtnl lock.

    Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
    Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
    Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Nothing else that calls __netpoll_setup or ndo_netpoll_setup
requires a gfp paramter, so remove the gfp parameter from both
of these functions making the code clearer.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-27 15:36:38 -07:00
committed by David S. Miller
parent 3f705f73a0
commit a8779ec1c5
9 changed files with 29 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@@ -1031,8 +1031,7 @@ static void team_port_leave(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
gfp_t gfp)
static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
{
struct netpoll *np;
int err;
@@ -1040,11 +1039,11 @@ static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
if (!team->dev->npinfo)
return 0;
np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), gfp);
np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!np)
return -ENOMEM;
err = __netpoll_setup(np, port->dev, gfp);
err = __netpoll_setup(np, port->dev);
if (err) {
kfree(np);
return err;
@@ -1067,8 +1066,7 @@ static void team_port_disable_netpoll(struct team_port *port)
kfree(np);
}
#else
static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
gfp_t gfp)
static int team_port_enable_netpoll(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -1156,7 +1154,7 @@ static int team_port_add(struct team *team, struct net_device *port_dev)
goto err_vids_add;
}
err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port, GFP_KERNEL);
err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port);
if (err) {
netdev_err(dev, "Failed to enable netpoll on device %s\n",
portname);
@@ -1850,7 +1848,7 @@ static void team_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
}
static int team_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev,
struct netpoll_info *npifo, gfp_t gfp)
struct netpoll_info *npifo)
{
struct team *team = netdev_priv(dev);
struct team_port *port;
@@ -1858,7 +1856,7 @@ static int team_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev,
mutex_lock(&team->lock);
list_for_each_entry(port, &team->port_list, list) {
err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port, gfp);
err = team_port_enable_netpoll(team, port);
if (err) {
__team_netpoll_cleanup(team);
break;