Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6

Pull crypto updates from Herbert Xu:
 "API:
   - Removed CRYPTO_TFM_RES flags
   - Extended spawn grabbing to all algorithm types
   - Moved hash descsize verification into API code

  Algorithms:
   - Fixed recursive pcrypt dead-lock
   - Added new 32 and 64-bit generic versions of poly1305
   - Added cryptogams implementation of x86/poly1305

  Drivers:
   - Added support for i.MX8M Mini in caam
   - Added support for i.MX8M Nano in caam
   - Added support for i.MX8M Plus in caam
   - Added support for A33 variant of SS in sun4i-ss
   - Added TEE support for Raven Ridge in ccp
   - Added in-kernel API to submit TEE commands in ccp
   - Added AMD-TEE driver
   - Added support for BCM2711 in iproc-rng200
   - Added support for AES256-GCM based ciphers for chtls
   - Added aead support on SEC2 in hisilicon"

* 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6: (244 commits)
  crypto: arm/chacha - fix build failured when kernel mode NEON is disabled
  crypto: caam - add support for i.MX8M Plus
  crypto: x86/poly1305 - emit does base conversion itself
  crypto: hisilicon - fix spelling mistake "disgest" -> "digest"
  crypto: chacha20poly1305 - add back missing test vectors and test chunking
  crypto: x86/poly1305 - fix .gitignore typo
  tee: fix memory allocation failure checks on drv_data and amdtee
  crypto: ccree - erase unneeded inline funcs
  crypto: ccree - make cc_pm_put_suspend() void
  crypto: ccree - split overloaded usage of irq field
  crypto: ccree - fix PM race condition
  crypto: ccree - fix FDE descriptor sequence
  crypto: ccree - cc_do_send_request() is void func
  crypto: ccree - fix pm wrongful error reporting
  crypto: ccree - turn errors to debug msgs
  crypto: ccree - fix AEAD decrypt auth fail
  crypto: ccree - fix typo in comment
  crypto: ccree - fix typos in error msgs
  crypto: atmel-{aes,sha,tdes} - Retire crypto_platform_data
  crypto: x86/sha - Eliminate casts on asm implementations
  ...

Documentation/core-api/index.rst

@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ Core utilities
    ../RCU/index
    gcc-plugins
    symbol-namespaces
+   padata
 
 
 Interfaces for kernel debugging

Documentation/core-api/padata.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=======================================
+The padata parallel execution mechanism
+=======================================
+
+:Date: December 2019
+
+Padata is a mechanism by which the kernel can farm jobs out to be done in
+parallel on multiple CPUs while retaining their ordering.  It was developed for
+use with the IPsec code, which needs to be able to perform encryption and
+decryption on large numbers of packets without reordering those packets.  The
+crypto developers made a point of writing padata in a sufficiently general
+fashion that it could be put to other uses as well.
+
+Usage
+=====
+
+Initializing
+------------
+
+The first step in using padata is to set up a padata_instance structure for
+overall control of how jobs are to be run::
+
+    #include <linux/padata.h>
+
+    struct padata_instance *padata_alloc_possible(const char *name);
+
+'name' simply identifies the instance.
+
+There are functions for enabling and disabling the instance::
+
+    int padata_start(struct padata_instance *pinst);
+    void padata_stop(struct padata_instance *pinst);
+
+These functions are setting or clearing the "PADATA_INIT" flag; if that flag is
+not set, other functions will refuse to work.  padata_start() returns zero on
+success (flag set) or -EINVAL if the padata cpumask contains no active CPU
+(flag not set).  padata_stop() clears the flag and blocks until the padata
+instance is unused.
+
+Finally, complete padata initialization by allocating a padata_shell::
+
+   struct padata_shell *padata_alloc_shell(struct padata_instance *pinst);
+
+A padata_shell is used to submit a job to padata and allows a series of such
+jobs to be serialized independently.  A padata_instance may have one or more
+padata_shells associated with it, each allowing a separate series of jobs.
+
+Modifying cpumasks
+------------------
+
+The CPUs used to run jobs can be changed in two ways, programatically with
+padata_set_cpumask() or via sysfs.  The former is defined::
+
+    int padata_set_cpumask(struct padata_instance *pinst, int cpumask_type,
+			   cpumask_var_t cpumask);
+
+Here cpumask_type is one of PADATA_CPU_PARALLEL or PADATA_CPU_SERIAL, where a
+parallel cpumask describes which processors will be used to execute jobs
+submitted to this instance in parallel and a serial cpumask defines which
+processors are allowed to be used as the serialization callback processor.
+cpumask specifies the new cpumask to use.
+
+There may be sysfs files for an instance's cpumasks.  For example, pcrypt's
+live in /sys/kernel/pcrypt/<instance-name>.  Within an instance's directory
+there are two files, parallel_cpumask and serial_cpumask, and either cpumask
+may be changed by echoing a bitmask into the file, for example::
+
+    echo f > /sys/kernel/pcrypt/pencrypt/parallel_cpumask
+
+Reading one of these files shows the user-supplied cpumask, which may be
+different from the 'usable' cpumask.
+
+Padata maintains two pairs of cpumasks internally, the user-supplied cpumasks
+and the 'usable' cpumasks.  (Each pair consists of a parallel and a serial
+cpumask.)  The user-supplied cpumasks default to all possible CPUs on instance
+allocation and may be changed as above.  The usable cpumasks are always a
+subset of the user-supplied cpumasks and contain only the online CPUs in the
+user-supplied masks; these are the cpumasks padata actually uses.  So it is
+legal to supply a cpumask to padata that contains offline CPUs.  Once an
+offline CPU in the user-supplied cpumask comes online, padata is going to use
+it.
+
+Changing the CPU masks are expensive operations, so it should not be done with
+great frequency.
+
+Running A Job
+-------------
+
+Actually submitting work to the padata instance requires the creation of a
+padata_priv structure, which represents one job::
+
+    struct padata_priv {
+        /* Other stuff here... */
+	void                    (*parallel)(struct padata_priv *padata);
+	void                    (*serial)(struct padata_priv *padata);
+    };
+
+This structure will almost certainly be embedded within some larger
+structure specific to the work to be done.  Most of its fields are private to
+padata, but the structure should be zeroed at initialisation time, and the
+parallel() and serial() functions should be provided.  Those functions will
+be called in the process of getting the work done as we will see
+momentarily.
+
+The submission of the job is done with::
+
+    int padata_do_parallel(struct padata_shell *ps,
+		           struct padata_priv *padata, int *cb_cpu);
+
+The ps and padata structures must be set up as described above; cb_cpu
+points to the preferred CPU to be used for the final callback when the job is
+done; it must be in the current instance's CPU mask (if not the cb_cpu pointer
+is updated to point to the CPU actually chosen).  The return value from
+padata_do_parallel() is zero on success, indicating that the job is in
+progress. -EBUSY means that somebody, somewhere else is messing with the
+instance's CPU mask, while -EINVAL is a complaint about cb_cpu not being in the
+serial cpumask, no online CPUs in the parallel or serial cpumasks, or a stopped
+instance.
+
+Each job submitted to padata_do_parallel() will, in turn, be passed to
+exactly one call to the above-mentioned parallel() function, on one CPU, so
+true parallelism is achieved by submitting multiple jobs.  parallel() runs with
+software interrupts disabled and thus cannot sleep.  The parallel()
+function gets the padata_priv structure pointer as its lone parameter;
+information about the actual work to be done is probably obtained by using
+container_of() to find the enclosing structure.
+
+Note that parallel() has no return value; the padata subsystem assumes that
+parallel() will take responsibility for the job from this point.  The job
+need not be completed during this call, but, if parallel() leaves work
+outstanding, it should be prepared to be called again with a new job before
+the previous one completes.
+
+Serializing Jobs
+----------------
+
+When a job does complete, parallel() (or whatever function actually finishes
+the work) should inform padata of the fact with a call to::
+
+    void padata_do_serial(struct padata_priv *padata);
+
+At some point in the future, padata_do_serial() will trigger a call to the
+serial() function in the padata_priv structure.  That call will happen on
+the CPU requested in the initial call to padata_do_parallel(); it, too, is
+run with local software interrupts disabled.
+Note that this call may be deferred for a while since the padata code takes
+pains to ensure that jobs are completed in the order in which they were
+submitted.
+
+Destroying
+----------
+
+Cleaning up a padata instance predictably involves calling the three free
+functions that correspond to the allocation in reverse::
+
+    void padata_free_shell(struct padata_shell *ps);
+    void padata_stop(struct padata_instance *pinst);
+    void padata_free(struct padata_instance *pinst);
+
+It is the user's responsibility to ensure all outstanding jobs are complete
+before any of the above are called.
+
+Interface
+=========
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/padata.h
+.. kernel-doc:: kernel/padata.c