clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.timer_cpu.active_cleared_last = false;
}
static cycle_t kvm_phys_timer_read(void)
static u64 kvm_phys_timer_read(void)
{
return timecounter->cc->read(timecounter->cc);
}
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void kvm_timer_inject_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
static u64 kvm_timer_compute_delta(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
cycle_t cval, now;
u64 cval, now;
cval = vcpu->arch.timer_cpu.cntv_cval;
now = kvm_phys_timer_read() - vcpu->kvm->arch.timer.cntvoff;
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static bool kvm_timer_irq_can_fire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
bool kvm_timer_should_fire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
cycle_t cval, now;
u64 cval, now;
if (!kvm_timer_irq_can_fire(vcpu))
return false;