clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ extern void tk_debug_account_sleep_time(struct timespec64 *t);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
{
cycle_t ret = (now - last) & mask;
u64 ret = (now - last) & mask;
/*
* Prevent time going backwards by checking the MSB of mask in
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
return ret & ~(mask >> 1) ? 0 : ret;
}
#else
static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
{
return (now - last) & mask;
}