clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(timecounter_init);
*/
static u64 timecounter_read_delta(struct timecounter *tc)
{
cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
u64 cycle_now, cycle_delta;
u64 ns_offset;
/* read cycle counter: */
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(timecounter_read);
* time previous to the time stored in the cycle counter.
*/
static u64 cc_cyc2ns_backwards(const struct cyclecounter *cc,
cycle_t cycles, u64 mask, u64 frac)
u64 cycles, u64 mask, u64 frac)
{
u64 ns = (u64) cycles;
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static u64 cc_cyc2ns_backwards(const struct cyclecounter *cc,
}
u64 timecounter_cyc2time(struct timecounter *tc,
cycle_t cycle_tstamp)
u64 cycle_tstamp)
{
u64 delta = (cycle_tstamp - tc->cycle_last) & tc->cc->mask;
u64 nsec = tc->nsec, frac = tc->frac;