clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
*/
struct tk_read_base {
struct clocksource *clock;
cycle_t (*read)(struct clocksource *cs);
cycle_t mask;
cycle_t cycle_last;
u64 (*read)(struct clocksource *cs);
u64 mask;
u64 cycle_last;
u32 mult;
u32 shift;
u64 xtime_nsec;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct timekeeper {
struct timespec64 raw_time;
/* The following members are for timekeeping internal use */
cycle_t cycle_interval;
u64 cycle_interval;
u64 xtime_interval;
s64 xtime_remainder;
u32 raw_interval;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ extern void update_vsyscall_tz(void);
extern void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *ts, struct timespec *wtm,
struct clocksource *c, u32 mult,
cycle_t cycle_last);
u64 cycle_last);
extern void update_vsyscall_tz(void);
#else