clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ int mlx4_get_roce_gid_from_slave(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, int slave_id,
int mlx4_FLOW_STEERING_IB_UC_QP_RANGE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u32 min_range_qpn,
u32 max_range_qpn);
cycle_t mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev);
u64 mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev);
struct mlx4_active_ports {
DECLARE_BITMAP(ports, MLX4_MAX_PORTS);