clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ int mlx4_get_roce_gid_from_slave(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, int slave_id,
|
||||
int mlx4_FLOW_STEERING_IB_UC_QP_RANGE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u32 min_range_qpn,
|
||||
u32 max_range_qpn);
|
||||
|
||||
cycle_t mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev);
|
||||
u64 mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev);
|
||||
|
||||
struct mlx4_active_ports {
|
||||
DECLARE_BITMAP(ports, MLX4_MAX_PORTS);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user