clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -259,11 +259,11 @@ extern void gic_init(unsigned long gic_base_addr,
|
||||
unsigned long gic_addrspace_size, unsigned int cpu_vec,
|
||||
unsigned int irqbase);
|
||||
extern void gic_clocksource_init(unsigned int);
|
||||
extern cycle_t gic_read_count(void);
|
||||
extern u64 gic_read_count(void);
|
||||
extern unsigned int gic_get_count_width(void);
|
||||
extern cycle_t gic_read_compare(void);
|
||||
extern void gic_write_compare(cycle_t cnt);
|
||||
extern void gic_write_cpu_compare(cycle_t cnt, int cpu);
|
||||
extern u64 gic_read_compare(void);
|
||||
extern void gic_write_compare(u64 cnt);
|
||||
extern void gic_write_cpu_compare(u64 cnt, int cpu);
|
||||
extern void gic_start_count(void);
|
||||
extern void gic_stop_count(void);
|
||||
extern int gic_get_c0_compare_int(void);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user