clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -259,11 +259,11 @@ extern void gic_init(unsigned long gic_base_addr,
unsigned long gic_addrspace_size, unsigned int cpu_vec,
unsigned int irqbase);
extern void gic_clocksource_init(unsigned int);
extern cycle_t gic_read_count(void);
extern u64 gic_read_count(void);
extern unsigned int gic_get_count_width(void);
extern cycle_t gic_read_compare(void);
extern void gic_write_compare(cycle_t cnt);
extern void gic_write_cpu_compare(cycle_t cnt, int cpu);
extern u64 gic_read_compare(void);
extern void gic_write_compare(u64 cnt);
extern void gic_write_cpu_compare(u64 cnt, int cpu);
extern void gic_start_count(void);
extern void gic_stop_count(void);
extern int gic_get_c0_compare_int(void);