clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -50,6 +50,6 @@ dw_apb_clocksource_init(unsigned rating, const char *name, void __iomem *base,
unsigned long freq);
void dw_apb_clocksource_register(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
void dw_apb_clocksource_start(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
cycle_t dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
u64 dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
#endif /* __DW_APB_TIMER_H__ */