clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -50,6 +50,6 @@ dw_apb_clocksource_init(unsigned rating, const char *name, void __iomem *base,
|
||||
unsigned long freq);
|
||||
void dw_apb_clocksource_register(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
|
||||
void dw_apb_clocksource_start(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
|
||||
cycle_t dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
|
||||
u64 dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __DW_APB_TIMER_H__ */
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user