clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int cpts_fifo_read(struct cpts *cpts, int match)
|
||||
return type == match ? 0 : -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static cycle_t cpts_systim_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
|
||||
static u64 cpts_systim_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 val = 0;
|
||||
struct cpts_event *event;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user