clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1823,10 +1823,10 @@ static void unmap_bf_area(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
|
||||
io_mapping_free(mlx4_priv(dev)->bf_mapping);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cycle_t mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
|
||||
u64 mlx4_read_clock(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 clockhi, clocklo, clockhi1;
|
||||
cycle_t cycles;
|
||||
u64 cycles;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user