clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void timrot_irq_acknowledge(void)
HW_TIMROT_TIMCTRLn(0) + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
}
static cycle_t timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return ~((__raw_readl(mxs_timrot_base + HW_TIMROT_TIMCOUNTn(1))
& 0xffff0000) >> 16);