clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void timrot_irq_acknowledge(void)
|
||||
HW_TIMROT_TIMCTRLn(0) + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static cycle_t timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
static u64 timrotv1_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ~((__raw_readl(mxs_timrot_base + HW_TIMROT_TIMCOUNTn(1))
|
||||
& 0xffff0000) >> 16);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user