clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void dw_apb_clocksource_start(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs)
|
||||
dw_apb_clocksource_read(dw_cs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static cycle_t __apbt_read_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
static u64 __apbt_read_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 current_count;
|
||||
struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs =
|
||||
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static cycle_t __apbt_read_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
current_count = apbt_readl_relaxed(&dw_cs->timer,
|
||||
APBTMR_N_CURRENT_VALUE);
|
||||
|
||||
return (cycle_t)~current_count;
|
||||
return (u64)~current_count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void apbt_restart_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ void dw_apb_clocksource_register(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @dw_cs: The clocksource to read.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cycle_t dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs)
|
||||
u64 dw_apb_clocksource_read(struct dw_apb_clocksource *dw_cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (cycle_t)~apbt_readl(&dw_cs->timer, APBTMR_N_CURRENT_VALUE);
|
||||
return (u64)~apbt_readl(&dw_cs->timer, APBTMR_N_CURRENT_VALUE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user