clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -1101,9 +1101,9 @@ static void tsc_resume(struct clocksource *cs)
* checking the result of read_tsc() - cycle_last for being negative.
* That works because CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64) does not mask out any bit.
*/
static cycle_t read_tsc(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 read_tsc(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return (cycle_t)rdtsc_ordered();
return (u64)rdtsc_ordered();
}
/*
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
/*
* Convert ART to TSC given numerator/denominator found in detect_art()
*/
struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(cycle_t art)
struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(u64 art)
{
u64 tmp, res, rem;