clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static unsigned int sbus_cycles_offset(void)
return offset;
}
static cycle_t timer_cs_read(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 timer_cs_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
unsigned int seq, offset;
u64 cycles;

View File

@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ void udelay(unsigned long usecs)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(udelay);
static cycle_t clocksource_tick_read(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 clocksource_tick_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return tick_ops->get_tick();
}