clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
* The HPT is free running from SB1250_HPT_VALUE down to 0 then starts over
* again.
*/
static inline cycle_t sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
static inline u64 sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
{
unsigned int count;
void __iomem *addr;
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline cycle_t sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
return SB1250_HPT_VALUE - count;
}
static cycle_t sb1250_hpt_read(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 sb1250_hpt_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return sb1250_hpt_get_cycles();
}