clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
|
||||
* The HPT is free running from SB1250_HPT_VALUE down to 0 then starts over
|
||||
* again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline cycle_t sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
|
||||
static inline u64 sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int count;
|
||||
void __iomem *addr;
|
||||
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline cycle_t sb1250_hpt_get_cycles(void)
|
||||
return SB1250_HPT_VALUE - count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static cycle_t sb1250_hpt_read(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
static u64 sb1250_hpt_read(struct clocksource *cs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return sb1250_hpt_get_cycles();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user