clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-21 20:32:01 +01:00
parent 7c0f6ba682
commit a5a1d1c291
132 changed files with 320 additions and 327 deletions

View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
#include "fsyscall_gtod_data.h"
static cycle_t itc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs);
static u64 itc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs);
struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t fsyscall_gtod_data;
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void ia64_init_itm(void)
}
}
static cycle_t itc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
static u64 itc_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
{
unsigned long lcycle, now, ret;
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ void update_vsyscall_tz(void)
}
void update_vsyscall_old(struct timespec *wall, struct timespec *wtm,
struct clocksource *c, u32 mult, cycle_t cycle_last)
struct clocksource *c, u32 mult, u64 cycle_last)
{
write_seqcount_begin(&fsyscall_gtod_data.seq);